In March, Stephen Kidd, Diloá Athias and Olivia Claxton wrote a critique of the ILO’s estimates of the universal social security financing gaps. The ILO responded, defending their results. You can find their response here.
Stephen and Diloá have provided a further response to the ILO and maintain that the ILO’s estimate of a cost of 19.8 per cent of cumulative GDP to achieve universal social security across low-income countries is too high. Further, they argue that the ILO’s calculation that it would cost 1.3 per cent to bridge the social security coverage gap across all low- and middle-income countries is an underestimate.
To read the full article: click here
Disclaimer: Except for articles published on Blog Tadamon and the content of the resource pages, all materials on this website, including their respective photographs, are indexed from their original sources. All rights remain with the respective copyright holders.
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.